Escorts who hate reviews

tits and sass is a sex worker produced blog with a HEAVY slant towards it’s sex worker target audience. Pose a question as a male (mark, trick, client, time waster) and you’re liable to get jumped on by a host of writers with names like strawberry and dior and dimilo.

Still it’s interesting reading to get an idea of how the other side thinks. This week they take to task the culture of hobbyists and their worship of the review. If you are of the TER VIP status with triple digit reviews on your record, maybe you should not read the story. Definitely ego deflating. Words like disgusting, review trolls, and misogynistic, pretty much tell you their feelings about being reviewed.

What’s funny in a sad kind of way is how these ladies always seem to not have a problem unloading on the very guys who keep their bills paid, yet always never admitting their part in the booty process. It takes two to tango. You really have no justification to call a guy a pervert because he wants to piss on you for cash, when you are the one accepting the piss and the cash!

One of the most strident harridans mentions that she finds the reviews misogynistic in their treatment of women. Yet I would bet she finds nothing wrong with her battle axe sisters writing about a session and how disgusted they were with the client but kept smiling because they were thinking about the bills that would be paid with the session tab.

That’d how it runs in estrogenworld.com.

We are not allowed to demean them as sex objects, but it’s perfectly ok to demean us as cash objects.

All I can think of after reading this crap, is Bravo to the internet as the great equalizer, and

Good things come to the righteous

(925) 709-4585

Personally, I think she looks twice as good as Miss I do not cater to black males Sophine. Fuller lips, more curves.

Probably more happiness in her life.

Here’s to 9 1/2 inches of black steel that I’d love to introduce in her life. Right from that back position.

[Insert]fatass[/Insert]

Candy is in town

(612) 298-4275

Backpage fake 100

One by one, they shall be exposed.

*screenshot

props to Inspector KMN.

Another backpage fake ad?

Is Jessica on backpage real?

DON'T TEASE THE HORNY BOOTYLUVER.

This poor girl is stuck in erotic limbo. Nothing about her ad screams fake, no url watermark, no pro lighting and posing, no tineye warnings. Her only crime is that she just looks too goddam good to be slinging pussy on backpage! Speaks volumes about the psyche of the average bootyluver that as soon as we see a decent looking girl, we immediately think fake. Are we inclined to believe that only unattractive girls post on backpage?

But the questions about Tanya/Jessica linger mainly because other things about the ad strike the hollow note. For one thing, she changes her name so often, you lose track of who she’s calling herself this week. Second, she really does look too good to be true. Cliche, yes, but most cliches are founded in truth. This chick is pretty much flawless. Not an ounce of fat anywhere. Perfectly flat tummy, with the nice sexy abs, pretty hair, lovely smile, nice tan, irresistible legs, should I go on??

The pics in the ad have been posted for quite some time and I have yet to see anyone expose her as a fake with proof, but it’s probably just a matter of time. You can only fool so many people for so long.

However if they are indeed stolen pics, I give the thief huge props for her choice of target.

Without a question, she is the #1 stunna on backpage.

Probably also the biggest fake.

Click the pic for the ad.